| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| * | add dist.ini | doy | 2009-04-16 | 1 | -0/+11 |
| * | move the actual logic into the metaclass, rather than the sugar layer - shoul... | doy | 2009-04-16 | 2 | -54/+54 |
| * | whitespace | doy | 2009-04-15 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| * | gahh, meta stuff makes my head hurt | doy | 2009-04-15 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| * | add more failing tests | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -1/+9 |
| * | typo | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | better test for can_be_inlined | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -2/+3 |
| * | reorder the non-immutable constructor a bit to line up better with the inline... | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -6/+5 |
| * | comment fix | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | comment | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| * | stop using Moose::extends | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -6/+5 |
| * | comment | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| * | look up the proper constructor name | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -2/+3 |
| * | more intelligent inlining (i hope?) | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -62/+2 |
| * | add comment | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| * | fix up some comments | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -2/+1 |
| * | oh god what am i doing | doy | 2009-04-13 | 3 | -0/+104 |
| * | stop unconditionally preventing the constructor from being inlined | doy | 2009-04-12 | 2 | -13/+0 |
| * | these should be inlined by moose | doy | 2009-04-12 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| * | hmmm, these tests are wrong | doy | 2009-04-12 | 1 | -5/+1 |
| * | no, moose doesn't automatically inline constructors, i was just getting my ow... | doy | 2009-04-11 | 2 | -4/+7 |
| * | actually test the right thing in the tests for inheriting from moose - they f... | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -7/+5 |
| * | use has_method rather than get_method for testing for existence | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| * | add tests for adding the constructor properly when inheriting from non-moose ... | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+6 |
| * | add more tests for inheriting from moose classes | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -3/+28 |
| * | add a test for extending moose classes | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -0/+32 |
| * | extends shouldn't do anything special to the constructor if it would otherwis... | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| * | comments | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+4 |
| * | don't call ->meta directly | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | simplify | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -2/+1 |
| * | whitespace | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | add another test | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+3 |
| * | oops, the failure was because it should actually be constructor_class_roles | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| * | add a test for multi-level inheritance, with a failure | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -0/+45 |
| * | start trying to use a constructor metaclass role to do things more intelligently | doy | 2009-04-10 | 2 | -10/+23 |
| * | eh, let's just overwrite extends, extends_nonmoose is too wordy | doy | 2009-04-10 | 6 | -8/+8 |
| * | todo comment | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| * | add tests for BUILD | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -0/+57 |
| * | hmmm, this conditional wasn't doing anything and tests still pass, so...? pro... | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -23/+20 |
| * | add a few comments | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -0/+6 |
| * | aha - what i really need to be doing here is using normal method resolution t... | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -15/+17 |
| * | factor the constructor out into a separate sub | doy | 2009-04-09 | 1 | -13/+15 |
| * | okay... stop erroring for now, just only add Moose::Object as a superclass if... | doy | 2009-04-09 | 1 | -7/+4 |
| * | add a test for immutability | doy | 2009-04-08 | 1 | -0/+43 |
| * | default to inline_constructor => 0 on make_immutable | doy | 2009-04-08 | 2 | -0/+23 |
| * | a few more tests | doy | 2009-04-08 | 2 | -0/+61 |
| * | bail out if we can't load the module | doy | 2009-04-08 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| * | whitespace | doy | 2009-04-08 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| * | error if we try to extend moose classes | doy | 2009-04-08 | 1 | -2/+9 |
| * | correct number of tests | doy | 2009-04-07 | 1 | -1/+1 |
