| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
* | add the moose faq entry on this topic to the see also section | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -0/+2 |
* | add synopsis | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -0/+24 |
* | reorder some doc sections | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -5/+5 |
* | doc cleanups | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -8/+8 |
* | flesh out the ending docs | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -4/+33 |
* | start stubbing out docs | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -0/+67 |
* | rewrite the _make_immutable_transformer wrapper to be more sane | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -2/+15 |
* | don't inline a constructor if inline_constructor => 0 is passed to make_immut... | doy | 2009-04-20 | 1 | -3/+5 |
* | todo comment | doy | 2009-04-17 | 1 | -0/+1 |
* | move the actual logic into the metaclass, rather than the sugar layer - shoul... | doy | 2009-04-16 | 2 | -54/+54 |
* | whitespace | doy | 2009-04-15 | 1 | -0/+1 |
* | gahh, meta stuff makes my head hurt | doy | 2009-04-15 | 1 | -2/+2 |
* | better test for can_be_inlined | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -2/+3 |
* | reorder the non-immutable constructor a bit to line up better with the inline... | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -6/+5 |
* | comment fix | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -1/+1 |
* | comment | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -0/+1 |
* | stop using Moose::extends | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -6/+5 |
* | comment | doy | 2009-04-14 | 1 | -0/+3 |
* | look up the proper constructor name | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -2/+3 |
* | more intelligent inlining (i hope?) | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -62/+2 |
* | add comment | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -0/+3 |
* | fix up some comments | doy | 2009-04-13 | 1 | -2/+1 |
* | oh god what am i doing | doy | 2009-04-13 | 3 | -0/+104 |
* | stop unconditionally preventing the constructor from being inlined | doy | 2009-04-12 | 2 | -13/+0 |
* | no, moose doesn't automatically inline constructors, i was just getting my ow... | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -0/+3 |
* | extends shouldn't do anything special to the constructor if it would otherwis... | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -0/+3 |
* | comments | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+4 |
* | don't call ->meta directly | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+1 |
* | simplify | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -2/+1 |
* | whitespace | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -1/+1 |
* | oops, the failure was because it should actually be constructor_class_roles | doy | 2009-04-11 | 1 | -3/+3 |
* | start trying to use a constructor metaclass role to do things more intelligently | doy | 2009-04-10 | 2 | -10/+23 |
* | eh, let's just overwrite extends, extends_nonmoose is too wordy | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -2/+2 |
* | todo comment | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -0/+3 |
* | hmmm, this conditional wasn't doing anything and tests still pass, so...? pro... | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -23/+20 |
* | add a few comments | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -0/+6 |
* | aha - what i really need to be doing here is using normal method resolution t... | doy | 2009-04-10 | 1 | -15/+17 |
* | factor the constructor out into a separate sub | doy | 2009-04-09 | 1 | -13/+15 |
* | okay... stop erroring for now, just only add Moose::Object as a superclass if... | doy | 2009-04-09 | 1 | -7/+4 |
* | default to inline_constructor => 0 on make_immutable | doy | 2009-04-08 | 2 | -0/+23 |
* | whitespace | doy | 2009-04-08 | 1 | -0/+1 |
* | error if we try to extend moose classes | doy | 2009-04-08 | 1 | -2/+9 |
* | SUPER is resolved at compile time | doy | 2009-04-07 | 1 | -2/+4 |
* | initial implementation | doy | 2009-04-07 | 1 | -0/+26 |