moosex-nonmoose - easy subclassing of non-Moose classes

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
...
*	clean up some of the pod	doy	2009-04-23	1	-13/+13
\|
*	a few more todo comments	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+4
\|
*	docs for MooseX::NonMoose::Meta::Role::Constructor	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+46
\|
*	docs for MooseX::NonMoose::Meta::Role::Class	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+48
\|
*	add description section to docs	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+24
\|
*	comment in synopsis	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+1
\|
*	better rationale for not messing with the meta-instance api right now	doy	2009-04-20	1	-2/+3
\|
*	need to check that the constructor class's metaclass has does_role available ↵	doy	2009-04-20	1	-2/+4
\| \| \| \|	(it'll be a cmop class if no roles were applied)
*	fix _immutable_options wrapper	doy	2009-04-20	1	-6/+8
\|
*	don't use ->meta	doy	2009-04-20	1	-2/+2
\|
*	support using the metaclass trait without using the constructor trait	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+5
\|
*	convert the metaclass trait to use the new immutable api	doy	2009-04-20	1	-3/+2
\|
*	use has_nonmoose_constructor as the metaclass attr name	doy	2009-04-20	1	-3/+3
\|
*	add the moose faq entry on this topic to the see also section	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+2
\|
*	add synopsis	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+24
\|
*	reorder some doc sections	doy	2009-04-20	1	-5/+5
\|
*	doc cleanups	doy	2009-04-20	1	-8/+8
\|
*	flesh out the ending docs	doy	2009-04-20	1	-4/+33
\|
*	start stubbing out docs	doy	2009-04-20	1	-0/+67
\|
*	rewrite the _make_immutable_transformer wrapper to be more sane	doy	2009-04-20	1	-2/+15
\|
*	don't inline a constructor if inline_constructor => 0 is passed to ↵	doy	2009-04-20	1	-3/+5
\| \| \| \|	make_immutable
*	todo comment	doy	2009-04-17	1	-0/+1
\|
*	move the actual logic into the metaclass, rather than the sugar layer - ↵	doy	2009-04-16	2	-54/+54
\| \| \| \|	should work fine just using Moose's extends now
*	whitespace	doy	2009-04-15	1	-0/+1
\|
*	gahh, meta stuff makes my head hurt	doy	2009-04-15	1	-2/+2
\|
*	better test for can_be_inlined	doy	2009-04-14	1	-2/+3
\|
*	reorder the non-immutable constructor a bit to line up better with the ↵	doy	2009-04-14	1	-6/+5
\| \| \| \|	inlined version
*	comment fix	doy	2009-04-14	1	-1/+1
\|
*	comment	doy	2009-04-14	1	-0/+1
\|
*	stop using Moose::extends	doy	2009-04-14	1	-6/+5
\|
*	comment	doy	2009-04-14	1	-0/+3
\|
*	look up the proper constructor name	doy	2009-04-13	1	-2/+3
\|
*	more intelligent inlining (i hope?)	doy	2009-04-13	1	-62/+2
\|
*	add comment	doy	2009-04-13	1	-0/+3
\|
*	fix up some comments	doy	2009-04-13	1	-2/+1
\|
*	oh god what am i doing	doy	2009-04-13	3	-0/+104
\|
*	stop unconditionally preventing the constructor from being inlined	doy	2009-04-12	2	-13/+0
\|
*	no, moose doesn't automatically inline constructors, i was just getting my ↵	doy	2009-04-11	1	-0/+3
\| \| \| \|	own constructor back
*	extends shouldn't do anything special to the constructor if it would ↵	doy	2009-04-11	1	-0/+3
\| \| \| \|	otherwise just be calling a moose constructor
*	comments	doy	2009-04-11	1	-1/+4
\|
*	don't call ->meta directly	doy	2009-04-11	1	-1/+1
\|
*	simplify	doy	2009-04-11	1	-2/+1
\|
*	whitespace	doy	2009-04-11	1	-1/+1
\|
*	oops, the failure was because it should actually be constructor_class_roles	doy	2009-04-11	1	-3/+3
\|
*	start trying to use a constructor metaclass role to do things more intelligently	doy	2009-04-10	2	-10/+23
\|
*	eh, let's just overwrite extends, extends_nonmoose is too wordy	doy	2009-04-10	1	-2/+2
\|
*	todo comment	doy	2009-04-10	1	-0/+3
\|
*	hmmm, this conditional wasn't doing anything and tests still pass, so...? ↵	doy	2009-04-10	1	-23/+20
\| \| \| \|	probably look more into this
*	add a few comments	doy	2009-04-10	1	-0/+6
\|
*	aha - what i really need to be doing here is using normal method resolution ↵	doy	2009-04-10	1	-15/+17
\| \| \| \|	to my advantage