1 files changed, 2 insertions, 99 deletions
diff --git a/src/unicode-extra.c b/src/unicode-extra.c
index b661aef..17aaa42 100644
--- a/src/unicode-extra.c
+++ b/src/unicode-extra.c
@@ -3,78 +3,14 @@
 
 #include "vt100.h"
 
-/*
- * so, here's the story. unicode doesn't actually define monospace width for
- * characters in a way that's useful. there's an "east asian width" property
- * that mostly works, but leaves a bunch of things ambiguous (if you're
- * displaying this as part of a bunch of east asian text, then it's wide, but
- * if you're not, then it's narrow). we in general treat ambiguous characters
- * as narrow for now (although this should perhaps be an option in the future).
- * one place where this does not work out, though, is emoji. emoji do not have
- * a useful width property (see
- * http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2016/16027-emoji-terminals-eaw.pdf), and even the
- * proposal in that link to make every character with Emoji_Presentation=true a
- * wide character isn't really how things work in practice - for instance,
- * U+231A (WATCH) is rendered by most monospace fonts (that I've seen, anyway)
- * as a narrow character. as far as i can tell, it appears (although i'm not
- * certain of this) that all BMP characters with Emoji_Presentation=true are
- * narrow and all astral plane characters with Emoji_Presentation=true are
- * wide, so that's what i'm going to go with here. character ranges and data in
- * this file are taken from
- * http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/2.0//emoji-data.txt.
- */
-struct vt100_char_range {
-    uint32_t start;
-    uint32_t end;
-};
-
-static struct vt100_char_range vt100_wide_emoji[] = {
-    { 0x1F004, 0x1F004 },
-    { 0x1F0CF, 0x1F0CF },
-    { 0x1F18E, 0x1F18E },
-    { 0x1F191, 0x1F19A },
-    { 0x1F1E6, 0x1F1FF },
-    { 0x1F201, 0x1F201 },
-    { 0x1F21A, 0x1F21A },
-    { 0x1F22F, 0x1F22F },
-    { 0x1F232, 0x1F236 },
-    { 0x1F238, 0x1F23A },
-    { 0x1F250, 0x1F251 },
-    { 0x1F300, 0x1F320 },
-    { 0x1F32D, 0x1F335 },
-    { 0x1F337, 0x1F37C },
-    { 0x1F37E, 0x1F393 },
-    { 0x1F3A0, 0x1F3CA },
-    { 0x1F3CF, 0x1F3D3 },
-    { 0x1F3E0, 0x1F3F0 },
-    { 0x1F3F4, 0x1F3F4 },
-    { 0x1F3F8, 0x1F43E },
-    { 0x1F440, 0x1F440 },
-    { 0x1F442, 0x1F4FC },
-    { 0x1F4FF, 0x1F53D },
-    { 0x1F54B, 0x1F54E },
-    { 0x1F550, 0x1F567 },
-    { 0x1F595, 0x1F596 },
-    { 0x1F5FB, 0x1F64F },
-    { 0x1F680, 0x1F6C5 },
-    { 0x1F6CC, 0x1F6CC },
-    { 0x1F6D0, 0x1F6D0 },
-    { 0x1F6EB, 0x1F6EC },
-    { 0x1F910, 0x1F918 },
-    { 0x1F980, 0x1F984 },
-    { 0x1F9C0, 0x1F9C0 },
-};
-
 static int vt100_is_zero_width(uint32_t codepoint);
-static int vt100_is_wide_char(uint32_t codepoint, int wide_emoji);
-static int vt100_is_wide_emoji(uint32_t codepoint);
 
-int vt100_char_width(uint32_t codepoint, int wide_emoji)
+int vt100_char_width(uint32_t codepoint)
 {
     if (vt100_is_zero_width(codepoint)) {
         return 0;
     }
-    else if (vt100_is_wide_char(codepoint, wide_emoji)) {
+    else if (g_unichar_iswide(codepoint)) {
         return 2;
     }
     else {
@@ -88,36 +24,3 @@ static int vt100_is_zero_width(uint32_t codepoint)
      * do word wrapping */
     return g_unichar_iszerowidth(codepoint) || codepoint == 0xAD;
 }
-
-static int vt100_is_wide_char(uint32_t codepoint, int wide_emoji)
-{
-    return g_unichar_iswide(codepoint)
-        || (wide_emoji && vt100_is_wide_emoji(codepoint));
-}
-
-static int vt100_is_wide_emoji(uint32_t codepoint)
-{
-    static size_t ranges = sizeof(vt100_wide_emoji) / sizeof(struct vt100_char_range);
-    size_t low = 0, high = ranges - 1;
-
-    if (codepoint < vt100_wide_emoji[0].start) {
-        return 0;
-    }
-
-    do {
-        size_t cur = (high + low) / 2;
-        struct vt100_char_range range = vt100_wide_emoji[cur];
-
-        if (codepoint < range.start) {
-            high = cur - 1;
-        }
-        else if (codepoint > range.end) {
-            low = cur + 1;
-        }
-        else {
-            return 1;
-        }
-    } while (low <= high);
-
-    return 0;
-}